[CT] QueenOfAngels.com

[Daniel Moran]

If people insist on reading large chunks of text as html, I'll produce it 
that way. But in my experience I'd far rather read a .pdf file than html, 
certainly for long documents.

Just out of curiosity, why the preference for html, assuming you can read 
.pdf? Text is text. (I know why _I_ have a preference for .pdf, aside from 
thinking it looks better, I'm not dying to output in multiple formats.) But 
why you?


At 11:06 PM 1/11/2002 -0800, you wrote:

>On 11 Jan 02, at 21:46, Steven J. Owens wrote:
>
> >      I find PDF useful solely as a quick way to get print-formatted
> > material available on the net.  I would much prefer to see HTML
> > versions of stuff.  If necessary, I'll be happy to run it through a
> > converter for you.
>
>Agreed, pdfs are significantly annoying and slow compared to
>HTML text.
>
>-John Snead sneadj at mindspring.com
>____________________________
>continuing-time mailing list
>continuing-time at ralf.org
>http://www.ralf.org/mailman/listinfo/continuing-time
>
>
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.313 / Virus Database: 174 - Release Date: 1/2/2002
-------------- next part --------------

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.313 / Virus Database: 174 - Release Date: 1/2/2002